1. Nath R, Anderson LL, Luxton G et al. Dosimetry of interstitial brachytherapy sources: recommendations of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 43. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Med Phys 1995; 22: 209-234.
2.
Rivard MJ, Butler WM, DeWerd LA et al. Supplement to the 2004 update of the AAPM Task Group No. 43 Report. Med Phys 2007; 34: 2187-2205.
3.
Rivard MJ, Coursey BM, DeWerd LA et al. Update of AAPM Task Group No. 43 Report: a revised AAPM protocol for brachytherapy dose calculations. Med Phys 2004; 31: 633-674.
4.
Beaulieu L, Carlsson Tedgren A, Carrier JF et al. Report of the Task Group 186 on model-based dose calculation methods in brachytherapy beyond the TG-43 formalism: Current status and recommendations for clinical implementation. Med Phys 2012; 39: 6208-6236.
5.
Acuros BV. Algorithm Reference Guide, Document ID B504878R01A, Revision A. 2013; 8: 1-36.
6.
Van Veelen B, Ma Y, Beaulieu L. Whitepaper: ACE Advanced Collapsed cone Engine. Veenendal, the Netherlands: Elekta Corporation, 2015.
7.
Enger SA, Vijande J, Rivard MJ. Model-based dose calculation algorithms for brachytherapy dosimetry. Semin Radiat Oncol 2019; 30: 77-86.
8.
Papagiannis P, Pantelis E, Karaiskos P. Current state of the art brachytherapy treatment planning dosimetry algorithms. Br J Radiol 2014; 87: 20140163.
9.
Sloboda RS, Morrison H, Cawston-Grant B et al. A brief look at model-based dose calculation principles, practicalities, and promise. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2017; 9: 79-88.
10.
Zourari K, Pantelis E, Moutsatsos A et al. Dosimetric accuracy of a deterministic radiation transport based 192Ir brachytherapy treatment planning system. Part III. Comparison to Monte Carlo simulation in voxelized anatomical computational models. Med Phys 2013; 40: 011712.
11.
Howie A, Poder J, Brown R et al. Comparison of TG43 and Hounsfield Unit- based TG186 brachytherapy dose metrics in Oncentra Brachy for 100 patients receiving interstitial partial breast irradiation. Brachytherapy 2021; 20: 655-663.
12.
Hofbauer J, Kirisits C, Resch A et al. Impact of heterogeneity corrected dose calculation using a grid-based Boltzmann solver on breast and cervix cancer brachytherapy. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2016; 8: 143-149.
13.
Sinnatamby M, Vivekanandan N, Sathyanarayana R et al. Dosimetric comparison of AcurosTM BV with AAPM TG43 dose calculation formalism in breast interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy with the use of metal catheters. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2015; 7: 273-279.
14.
Thrower SL, Shaitelman SF, Bloom E et al. Comparison of dose distributions with TG-43 and collapsed cone convolution algorithms applied to accelerated partial breast irradiation patient plans. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 95:
15.
1520-1526.
16.
Bi SY, Chen ZJ, Sun X et al. Dosimetric comparison of AcurosBV with AAPM TG43 dose calculation formalism in cervical intraductal high-dose rate brachytherapy using three different applicators. Prec Radiat Oncol 2022; 6: 234-242.
17.
Radcliffe BA, Meltsner S, Yongbok K et al. PHSOR08 Retrospective Comparison of TG43 vs. AcurosBV model-based dose calculation algorithm (MBDCA) in cervical cancer patients treated with HDR brachytherapy boost. Brachytherapy 2022; 21: S27-S28.
18.
Dagli A, Yurt F, Yegin G. Evaluation of BrachyDose Monte Carlo code for HDR brachytherapy: dose comparison against Acuros® BV and TG-43 algorithms. J Radiother Pract 2020; 19: 76-83.
19.
Mikell JK, Klopp AH, Gonzalez Gonzalez MN et al. Impact of heterogeneity-based dose calculation using a deterministic grid-based Boltzmann equation solver for intracavitary brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 83: e417-e422.
20.
Siebert FA, Wolf S, Kóvacs G. Head and neck 192Ir HDR-brachytherapy dosimetry using a grid-based Boltzmann solver. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2013; 5: 232-235.
21.
Strand V, Major T, Polgar C et al. ESTRO-ACROP guideline: Interstitial multi-catheter breast brachytherapy as accelerated partial breast irradiation alone or as boost – GEC-ESTRO Breast Cancer Working Group practical recommendations. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128: 411-420.
22.
Arthur DW, Vicini FA, Kuske RR et al. Accelerated partial breast irradiation: an updated report from the American Brachytherapy Society. Brachytherapy 2003; 2: 124-130.
23.
Strnad V, Krug D, Sedlmayer et al. DEGRO practical guidance for partial-breast irradiation. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 196: 749-763.
24.
Kovacs G, Martinez-Monge R, Budrukkar A et al. GEC-ESTRO ACROP recommendations for head & neck brachytherapy in squamous cell carcinomas: 1st update – Improvement by cross sectional imaging based treatment planning and stepping source technology. Radiother Oncol 2017; 122: 248-254.
25.
Ferentinos K, Karagiannis E, Strouthos I et al. Computed tomography guided interstitial percutaneous high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the management of lung malignancies. A review of the literature. Brachytherapy 2021; 20: 892-899.
26.
Yousif AMY, Osman AFI, Halato MA. A review of dosimetric impact implementation of dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) for HDR brachytherapy. Phys Eng Sci Med 2021; 44: 871-886.
27.
Kirisits C, Siebert FA, Baltas D et al. Accuracy of volume and DVH parameters determined with different brachytherapy treatment planning systems. Radiother Oncol 2007; 84: 290-297.
28.
O’Connell D, Chang A, Lee A et al. TH-A-TRACK 3–07: investigating the impact of model-based dose calculation on interstitial lung brachytherapy and comparison to external beam SBRT. Med Phys 2020; 47: e367.
29.
Pantelis E, Papagiannis P, Karaiskos P et al. The effect of finite patient dimensions and tissue inhomogeneities on dosimetry planning of 192Ir HDR breast brachytherapy: a Monte Carlo dose verification study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 61: 1596-1602.
